☰ Menu
 
StudyBibleForum.com  Home | Search | Log In | Register
 
Click Here
44% off Bibles by the Case, Free Shipping.
NASB Topical Reference Bible - 55% off, from $13.48
Amplified Bible (2015-NEW!)
Enter to win a Bible


Translation:
Book Chap:verse

New Window
Translation:
Search Range:
Search word(s):

 

Results 1 - 20 of 756
Pages: [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ] >  Last [38] >>
Results from: Notes
On or After: Mon 09/28/15 Ordered by Date
Results Type Verse Author Date ID#
1 No examples Note Matt 28:1 Cole209 Tue 09/27/16, 5:27pm 243709
  EdB,
re: "Perhaps I misunderstood I thought you were looking for possible solutions to 3 days and 3 night in the tomb."

I'm not, but don't feel bad. For some reason I get that a lot.



re: "It this isn't what you are after perhaps you need to explain exactly what you are looking for."

I did that in the OP.
2 No examples Note Matt 28:1 EdB Tue 09/27/16, 12:39pm 243708
  Cole209
If you are looking for scripture support of the 3 days and 3 night as a explained by Jewish idiom I think you are probably searching for something that does not exist. However there are many other explanations of how that could occur and these have been discussed at length in the forum archives.
3 No examples Note Matt 28:1 EdB Tue 09/27/16, 12:34pm 243707
  Cole209
Perhaps I misunderstood I thought you were looking for possible solutions to
3 days and 3 night in the tomb. If you are Matt 13:40 is another scripture to search on in the forum database. Again there are many discussions on the subject in forum archives.
It this isn't what you are after perhaps you need to explain exactly what you are looking for.

Do some research on the what "The Sabbath" or the "The Great Sabbath" refers to in Jewish vennactular as opposed to the more common Sabbath day.
4 No examples Note Matt 28:1 Cole209 Tue 09/27/16, 10:01am 243706
  Also, don't know how Matthew 28:1 got into the OP. It's suppose to be Matthew 12:40.
5 No examples Note Matt 28:1 Cole209 Tue 09/27/16, 9:59am 243705
  I used the search function and found no posts which gave examples to show that it was common to forecast a daytime or a night time to being involved with an event when no part of the daytime or no part of the night time could occur.
6 emoticon test Note Jer 11:20 ipl Tue 09/27/16, 9:25am 243704
  Proper term is emoji rather than emoticon.
7 emoticon test Note Jer 11:20 ipl Tue 09/27/16, 5:39am 243701
  angel馃槆馃懠
devil馃槇馃懣馃懝
sheep馃悘馃悜
pig馃悥馃惙
snake馃悕
whale馃惓馃悑
bread馃崬
grapes馃崌
sun馃尀
moon馃寬
church馃拻
crown馃憫
earth馃寧
8 right to left Hebrew alphabet test Note Ps 111:1 ipl Mon 09/26/16, 8:39pm 243700
  Not sure where the tav at the end of the alphabet went:

讗 讘 讙 讚 讛 讜 讝 讞 讟 讬 讻讱 诇 诪诐 谞谉 住 注 驻祝 爪抓 拽 专 砖 转
9 right to left Hebrew alphabet test Note Ps 111:1 ipl Mon 09/26/16, 8:33pm 243699
  The alphabet at the top was typed on a virtual keyboard on an Android tablet and then emailed so it could be copied from the email on a Windows laptop and pasted in a Unicode document in Notepad. The Hebrew text was cut and pasted to Notepad. Carriage returns were inserted to break the verses when the beginning letter in the acrostic occurs. An extra carriage return was put before the colons at the end of the Hebrew verses to open a place for the final lines of an NASB verse to have a place to be inserted. There is still a slight problem with the verse numbers not appearing at the front of the line as they do in Notepad apparently because direction of the number 1 was left to right in the copied text but right to left in the subsequent numbers.
10 right to left Hebrew alphabet test Note Ps 111:1 ipl Mon 09/26/16, 7:47pm 243698
 
讗 讘 讙 讚 讛 讜 讝 讞 讟 讬 讻讱 诇 诪诐 谞谉 住 注 驻祝 爪抓 拽 专 砖

Psalm 111

1 讛址芝诇职诇讜旨 讬指吱讛旨讇 Praise the Lord!
讗讜止讚侄郑讛 讬职汁讛讜指讛 aleph I will give thanks to the Lord with all my heart,
讘职旨讻指诇志诇值讘指謶讘 讘职旨住謻讜止讚 讬职砖指讈专执郑讬诐 讜职注值讚指纸讛 bet In the company of the upright and in the assembly.

2 讙职旨汁讚止诇执讬诐 诪址注植砖值讉郑讬 讬职讛讜指謶讛 gimmel Great are the works of the Lord;
讚职旨譂专讜旨砖执讈謼讬诐 诇职讻指诇志讞侄驻职爪值讬讛侄纸诐 dalet They are studied by all who delight in them.

3 讛讜止讚志讜职讛指讚指芝专 驻指旨纸注殖诇謶讜止 hey Splendid and majestic is His work,
讜职譂爪执讚职拽指转謼讜止 注止诪侄芝讚侄转 诇指注址纸讚 vav And His righteousness endures forever.

4 讝值郑讻侄专 注指汁砖指讉讛 诇职谞执驻职诇职讗止转指謶讬讜 zayin He has made His wonders to be remembered;
讞址谞旨謻讜旨谉 讜职专址讞郑讜旨诐 讬职讛讜指纸讛 chet The Lord is gracious and compassionate.

5 讟侄汁专侄祝 谞指转址郑谉 诇执纸讬专值讗指謶讬讜 tet He has given food to those who fear Him;
讬执讝职讻止旨謻专 诇职注讜止诇指郑诐 讘职旨专执讬转纸讜止 yod He will remember His covenant forever.

6 讻止旨郑讞址 诪址汁注植砖指讉讬讜 讛执讙执旨郑讬讚 诇职注址诪旨謶讜止 kaf He has made known to His people the power of His works,
诇指转值芝转 诇指譂讛侄謼诐 谞址讞植诇址芝转 讙旨讜止讬执纸诐 lamed In giving them the heritage of the nations.

7 诪址注植砖值讉郑讬 讬指汁讚指讬讜 讗直诪侄郑转 讜旨诪执砖职讈驻指旨謶讟 mem The works of His hands are truth and justice;
谞侄譂讗直诪指谞执謼讬诐 讻指旨诇志驻执旨拽旨讜旨讚指纸讬讜 nun All His precepts are sure.

8 住职诪讜旨讻执郑讬诐 诇指注址郑讚 诇职注讜止诇指謶诐 samech They are upheld forever and ever;
注植譂砖讉讜旨讬执謼诐 讘侄旨讗直诪侄芝转 讜职讬指砖指纸讈专 ayin They are performed in truth and uprightness.

9 驻职旨讚证讜旨转讇 砖指讈謽诇址证讞 诇职注址诪旨謼讜止 pey He has sent redemption to His people;
爪执讜指旨纸讛志诇职注讜止诇指芝诐 讘职旨专执讬转謶讜止 tsade He has ordained His covenant forever;
拽指讚謻讜止砖讈 讜职谞讜止专指郑讗 砖职讈诪纸讜止 qof Holy and awesome is His name.

10 专值謽讗砖执讈证讬转 讞指讻职诪指吱讛讇 讬执专职讗址脂转 讬职讛讜指謼讛 resh The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom;
砖值讉郑讻侄诇 讟謻讜止讘 诇职讻指诇志注止砖值讉讬讛侄謶诐 shin A good understanding have all those who do His commandments;
转职旨譂讛执诇指旨转謼讜止 注止诪侄芝讚侄转 诇指注址纸讚 tav His praise endures forever.
11 New is not necessarily better than old Note 2 Kin 19:25 DocTrinsograce Tue 09/20/16, 2:27pm 243689
  "In view of the lamentable defects of modern life, a type of religion certainly should not be commended simply because it is modern or condemned simply because it is old. On the contrary, the condition of mankind is such that one may well ask what it is that made the men of past generations so great and the men of the present generations so small." --J. Gresham Machen

12 Worldly Extremes Note 1 John 2:11 EdB Mon 09/19/16, 6:01pm 243688
  Doc
You said and I quote
So, your Spirit Filled love of us will certainly forgive us for trying to use language as precisely as our God and our Lord Jesus and the Apostles have done. We do not find any others providing a better pattern.

There is no need to forgive you for using language precisely, where we must forgive is when you try to use that language as a facade to belittle or mock any theology in opposition to yours.

You are a crafty wordsmith and you have the ability to shut most people up before they even have a chance to discuss something that you deem is beneath you. Some have complained but most simply leave the forum shaking their heads saying what is the point.

This is what I object to. To me even Reformed theology has some virtue but not in your hands and the way you use it. That is what I object to and what I must keep trying to forgive.
13 An Old Contra-Biblical Doctrine Note John 16:14 EdB Mon 09/19/16, 5:53pm 243687
  Doc
You said and I quote.
"Well, as Christ said, so eloquently, your wisdom will be proved by her children. You may have difficulty in presenting such people as evidence. However, I am utterly delighted to have found Pentecostal pastors who are sound in doctrine as well as in practice. I had become fearful that your example was all that would be found anywhere in the midst of your particularly perspective.鈥

Doc be honest had I said the same about you the post would have disappeared never to be seen again. You have no idea of my doctrine, all you have ever seen is me trying to insure a fair and equal representation of the all denominations and orthodox theologies.

To do this many times I have had to come against Reformed theology and your persistence to quote it as though it were scripture. Of that I will admit guilt but for you to stand there pretend to be able to judge my doctrine is nonsense because you simply have no idea.
14 An Old Contra-Biblical Doctrine Note John 16:14 EdB Mon 09/19/16, 5:43pm 243686
  Hi, Ed...

And in your emotional and experiential and low view of the Scriptures, how will you be able to make men obedient disciples. As you assert that Reformed theology is wrong -- without even knowing the history or the logic or the word behind it -- what tool have you found to be superior to the very Word of God?

Romans 14:4 (NASB)
4 Who are you to judge the servant of another? 鈥

Where do you get off saying in my emotional and experiential and low view of Scripture?
Where is that coming from? You apply labels like Christmas stickers not to discuss butin attempt to intimidate and belittle another. I know the history of Reformed theology, I know the logic, and I know the handling of the word by Reformers to make their position.

What I have found is if I read Scripture literally without any manipulation of word, definition, context or cherry picking I see the Reformed theology does not line up with what I read.

Reformed theology must always be defined and explained it seem like it can never be taken at face value. Man鈥檚 logic must always be used to reason it out instead of allowing the words of scripture stand on their own.

You said
The proof of your success will be men who walk consistently in the fruit of the Spirit. I cannot comprehend the AOG position that places such a low priority on discipleship that way. How in the world does anyone even deal with John 14 and 15 in such a fashion.

What?? For a person to manifest the fruit of the Spirit is a disciple of Christ. I don鈥檛 see this as a low priority on discipleship. I see it as fruition of successful disciple making.
Galatians 5:22-26 (NKJV)
22 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, kindness, goodness, faithfulness,
23 gentleness, self-control. Against such there is no law.
24 And those who are Christ's have crucified the flesh with its passions and desires.
25 If we live in the Spirit, let us also walk in the Spirit.
26 Let us not become conceited, provoking one another, envying one another.

One explained to me, citing the AOG position paper, that the denomination believed that all the "sign" gifts could be manifest in complete absence of the fruit of the Spirit.

Ask him where in the position papers it says such a thing.

For you to repeat that is like me saying Reformed theology teaches pedophilia, which it does not! It is total nonsense and no where in any position paper is it even suggested.
15 Worldly Extremes Note 1 John 2:11 EdB Mon 09/19/16, 5:21pm 243685
  My dislike is not of nouns or language in general I object to labels that demean, denigrate and mock others because they do not agree with our theology. Labels are rarely used to encourage or edify.

When we wield scripture or our words at a lashing sword to slice the feet out from our brethren, then we are not doing to others as we would have them do unto us.

Yes Jesus did label the difference was Jesus is the truth not an opposing opinion held by mere man. Further Jesus never called us to judge or label he called us to love even our enemies. Romans 14:4 (NASB)
4 Who are you to judge the servant of another? To his own master he stands or falls; and he will stand, for the Lord is able to make him stand.
16 Man-Centered Theology Note Rom 11:33 EdB Mon 09/19/16, 5:04pm 243684
  God is always the center but the gospels are an account of man's experience in the presence of the Lord. Just as todays religious experience is.
This aspect of Christianity is often forgotten by those that have not experienced God.
They talk as experts but in fact they speak of things they don't know and never experienced.
To say we can't experience God is to say God can not do what He chooses to do.
No where in scripture does God ever say man can no longer experience God.
So why discount experience? Because it does not agree with a certain theology?
17 God's logic is lost to man Note Rom 11:33 EdB Mon 09/19/16, 4:58pm 243683
  Romans 11:33-35 (NASB)
33 Oh, the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are His judgments and unfathomable His ways!
34 For WHO HAS KNOWN THE MIND OF THE LORD, OR WHO BECAME HIS COUNSELOR?
35 Or WHO HAS FIRST GIVEN TO HIM THAT IT MIGHT BE PAID BACK TO HIM AGAIN?

God's logic is lost to man.
18 An Old Contra-Biblical Doctrine Note John 16:14 DocTrinsograce Mon 09/19/16, 4:40pm 243682
  Hi, Ed...

And in your emotional and experiential and low view of the Scriptures, how will you be able to make men obedient disciples. As you assert that Reformed theology is wrong -- without even knowing the history or the logic or the word behind it -- what tool have you found to be superior to the very Word of God?

The proof of your success will be men who walk consistently in the fruit of the Spirit. I cannot comprehend the AOG position that places such a low priority on discipleship that way. How in the world does anyone even deal with John 14 and 15 in such a fashion.

Well, as Christ said, so eloquently, your wisdom will be proved by her children. You may have difficulty in presenting such people as evidence. However, I am utterly delighted to have found Pentecostal pastors who are sound in doctrine as well as in practice. I had become fearful that your example was all that would be found anywhere in the midst of your particularly perspective.

If you ever want to meat these wonderfully Godly fellows, let me know, and I will arrange it. They are like a breath of fresh air, even drawing of my own heart to their words.

One explained to me, citing the AOG position paper, that the denomination believed that all the "sign" gifts could be manifest in complete absence of the fruit of the Spirit. I had never imagined such a thing. I apologize for having expected this when it is such a low priority for those who espouse Pentecostalism in the form it has taken over the last hundred years. I had misjudged it as hypocritical. It never occurred to me that those virtues would be thought of as so incidental. Slowly, I am learning.

In Him, Doc
19 Worldly Extremes Note 1 John 2:11 DocTrinsograce Mon 09/19/16, 4:27pm 243681
  Hi, Ed...

We do not meet with your approval, that has always been clear.

So, all we can do is to define our terms for one another -- or at least, we can explain our terms to you, if not the other way -- just as God through the Prophets did, and Jesus Christ did, and the Apostles did. If our presuppositions are not adequate for your purposes, then that's okay. It won't make the tiniest difference in how you teach, preach, or discuss. You've not been hesitant to put fourth your own many opinions and assumptions. I wonder how Jesus would explain it that stuff? I never quite understand hatred of language. It is odd, though, because God invented labels... and He even holds us responsible for our use of those labels (Matthew 12:3). So it just seems so weird to have people hate nouns so much. Of course, you can demonstrate that perspective by just avoiding them altogether... as if that could be done!

J. Gresham Machen described liberalism as, "This temper of mind is hostile to precise definitions. Indeed nothing makes a man more unpopular in the controversies of the present day than an insistence upon definition of terms. . . . Men discourse very eloquently today upon such subjects as God, religion, Christianity, atonement, redemption, faith; but are greatly incensed when they are asked to tell in simple language what they mean by these terms."

So, your Spirit Filled love of us will certainly forgive us for trying to use language as precisely as our God and our Lord Jesus and the Apostles have done. We do not find any others providing a better pattern.

Someday you will find defining labels as something of benefit in presenting the truth. Perhaps you will emerge from the liberal morass into a far superior way of defining words Biblically. Fundamentalism is within your reach, I do not doubt. I look forward to seeing it, and if I do not see it now, it is probably my own limitation.

In Him, Doc
20 Church Fathers? Part V Note Mark 7:9 EdB Mon 09/19/16, 4:16pm 243680
  Excuse me it was in this thread you said we must use logic to understand Genesis 1-3
Let me say this I understand Genesis not by my logic but by the illumination of the Holy Spirit and I want it no other way.
Result pages:  [  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ]  Next >  Last [38] >>



 
Click Here 

The Lockman Foundation does not pre-screen Postings.
Postings are the opinions of others and may or may not represent a commonly held view.

StudyBibleForum.com copyright © The Lockman Foundation 2001-2016
Permission to quote guidelines.

Gospel.com Community Member

Study Bible Forum